ASTM F1506-20a adds flame-resistant cloth face coverings (FRCFCs) to the scope. The FRCFCs are allowed reduced labeling requirements. Read more details on this Arcwear blog.
With this change, companies can meet NFPA 70E and OSHA 1910.269.
ArcWear provides preliminary guidance for manufacturers and end users.
IF a mask isn’t labeled with an arc rating, ask the manufacturer if the fabric meets ASTM F1506.
Neither ArcWear nor e-Hazard sells or promotes specific brands of PPE. If you have ANY questions, don’t hesitate to contact ArcWear or e-Hazard. Helping workers keep safe from arc flash and flash fire has been our mission since our founding in 1997.
This article aims to emphasize the ideology of always assessing the risk; even when solutions appear to be perfect, there are always caveats or rules that should be considered.
Have a question about electrical safety and standards?
does research and testing of PPE exposed to electrical arcs and is an arc flash expert. Hugh is a Sr. Consultant at ArcWear and Sr. Partner at e-Hazard. Read more about Hugh.
Here is the article that has the list. We will update this as we learn more.
Many may not have them listed on their website easy to find so call if you don’t seem them online.
/arcwear-publishes-guidance-for-fr-ar-cloth-face-coverings-as-astm-ballots-a-permanent-solution/
Our company has 200 masks made from Vinex coming from a local supplier. I doubt if they are labeled yet, but it is the same material as our class 2 daily wear. It is also molten metal rated, so our casting production folks can use it also
Thanks again for the info and eHazard forward thinking. Just received my order of 100 masks after a one month lead time. They are appropriately marked with HRC # and cal/cm2. Since the group of folks these are purchased for are in oil and gas which requires field clothing must be FR, my concern is wearers may now think the mask is a substitute for a balaclava. Shouldn’t be needed for the well-informed but perhaps a “not 70E compliant” on the label or packaging might be prudent. These masks do say they are 70E compliant. True that for “nothing inside the arc-flash boundary” that may melt, etc. but not covering the side and back of the head and “all parts of the body inside the AFB when needed would make them non-compliant. Understand all PPE is not for all tasks but the labeling as it is now may confuse. Another point to add to the training content. Guaranteed we are going to start seeing workers replace masks for balaclavas due to comfort and view masks as just something else in their arsenal to choose for electrical protection due to its marking. Appreciate all you are doing.
So is there any supplier who has FR/AR face masks available now? We are looking for this PPE for our electrical team.
Here is the article that has the list. We will update this as we learn more.
Many may not have them listed on their website easy to find so call if you don’t seem them online.
/arcwear-publishes-guidance-for-fr-ar-cloth-face-coverings-as-astm-ballots-a-permanent-solution/
I am linking to all the known Arc Rated Cloth Face Coverings that we know of to this article.
Thanks Pam.
Hugh
Good information and badly needed guidance during this current crisis that caught everyone off guard.
Our company has 200 masks made from Vinex coming from a local supplier. I doubt if they are labeled yet, but it is the same material as our class 2 daily wear. It is also molten metal rated, so our casting production folks can use it also
Thanks again for the info and eHazard forward thinking. Just received my order of 100 masks after a one month lead time. They are appropriately marked with HRC # and cal/cm2. Since the group of folks these are purchased for are in oil and gas which requires field clothing must be FR, my concern is wearers may now think the mask is a substitute for a balaclava. Shouldn’t be needed for the well-informed but perhaps a “not 70E compliant” on the label or packaging might be prudent. These masks do say they are 70E compliant. True that for “nothing inside the arc-flash boundary” that may melt, etc. but not covering the side and back of the head and “all parts of the body inside the AFB when needed would make them non-compliant. Understand all PPE is not for all tasks but the labeling as it is now may confuse. Another point to add to the training content. Guaranteed we are going to start seeing workers replace masks for balaclavas due to comfort and view masks as just something else in their arsenal to choose for electrical protection due to its marking. Appreciate all you are doing.