Why are F887 Harnesses Tested to 40 cal and not Lower?
Q: Why are ASTM F887 Harnesses tested to 40 cal/cm² and not lower? In the ArcWear research leading up to this standard, many years ago the U.S. Electric utilities looked at the…
Q: Why are ASTM F887 Harnesses tested to 40 cal/cm² and not lower? In the ArcWear research leading up to this standard, many years ago the U.S. Electric utilities looked at the…
A recurring question in many of our classes concerns verification for zero energy state, or verifying all energy sources are de-energized. One of our instructors recently contacted Kentucky OSH on…
Q: Your recent answer to the question about EEWP for applying grounds jogged my memory about a different question that has come up during our in-house training. When creating an…
Q: When a qualified worker opens a control panel to reset a fault condition on a motor drive or observe PLC status lights AND is within the ARC FLASH BOUNDARY,…
Q: Is there a specific standard and section that states an Energized Electrical Work Permit is NOT required when applying grounds for high voltage? A: (Two of our instructors gave similar…
Q: Can you comment on incidental stenciling (e.g., logos) on undergarments? Has OSHA commented on this? A: OSHA said in the new 1910.269 that non-FR logos are on you. We…
0 items in the cart ($0.00)